
i also like this one because robot looks CRAZY, and that's just what happens when you try to imitate alex.
lisa on the sly
As 50 Cent put it, dismissively, “When you sell like Eminem, you get plenty of groupie love.”
In his duet with the rapper Eminem, Nate Dogg describes his hunt for “a big old slut” in the single “Shake That.”
According to a government report released last year (“Sexual Behavior and Selected Health Measures”), men age 30 to 44 have had a median of six to eight sexual partners in their lifetimes. The women’s median was about four.




This small, sixteen-page pamphlet is produced to put inside the postage-paid, business-reply envelopes that come with junk mail offers. Every envelope collected is stuffed with the pamphlet and mailed back to its original company.

While public humiliation is de rigeur for reality programming, what makes “What Not to Wear” painful to watch is that none of its participants resemble the attention-hungry contestants on “Survivor” or “Real World.” These are, for the most part, really nice women, many of whom are working moms with low-level white-collar jobs who simply don’t have the money or time to preen in front of the mirror.
As the 19th century U.S. sociologist Thorstein Veblen observed in his book, The Theory Of The Leisure Class, “[O]ur apparel is always in evidence and affords an indication of our pecuniary standing to all observers at first glance. … [D]ress, therefore, in order to serve its purpose effectively should not only be expensive, but it should also make plain to all observers that the wearer is not engaged in any kind of productive labour.” So it isn’t surprising that a number of the tips doled out by the experts have little connection to the real lives of the women they’re making over. When one woman refuses to buy “dryclean only” clothes, Kelly and London are dismissive and impatient. Fashion has always been about class in the literal sense, and aesthetics aside, the women’s greatest fashion crime seems to be that they aren’t rich.
Worse, the show pretends that the women’s emotional debasement is “for their own good”—just like the tough love meted out by a Marine drill sergeant. “What Not to Wear’s” distinctly military approach is all the more striking when compared to the maternal attitude of its male counterpart, “Queer Eye for the Straight Guy,” where male participants are instead coaxed, teased and gently jollied into changing their wicked sartorial ways. While “Queer Eye” does offer a message of self-improvement — “it’s you, only better” — it does not make the same connection between self-esteem and attire. When men dress badly, it’s because they’re clueless, lazy or just plain incompetent. Not only is their sense of self not invested in how they look, but the so-called “Fab Four” are careful to handle their male participants’ egos with appropriate care and respect.
Interestingly, the hosts of “What Not to Wear” also take a kinder, gentler approach in their rare shows featuring a man. The critique is far milder, and tempered by fulsome compliments: “You’re a well-formed young man;” “You’re a prime piece of beef.”
When it comes to women, however, the hosts assume that they have nothing to lose, especially their pride. After all, what self-respecting woman would match pink polka-dotted boots with an ill-fitting candy stripe dress? More importantly, the show reveals how so-called fashion gurus constantly reiterate the most retrograde ideas about femininity in the name of style. Women are continually derided for looking “slutty,” “cheap and nasty,” or “trashy,” and cautioned against “sending the wrong message”—even as the frumpy ones are urged to show more flesh. Host Jessica London’s favorite word is “appropriate,” because women need to look, and—by the show’s logic—be proper at all times.
What’s sad is just how eager the women are to be transformed even at the expense of their dignity. Each episode ends with the participant beaming in delight and gratitude at how wonderful they look and feel. This reveals the depressing reality that women are no strangers to shame, which is a constant presence lurking on the edges of our daily lives. All it takes is an incautious look in the mirror in the morning; a dress that won’t fit at the mall; a careless remark from a boyfriend. Being a feminist just redoubles the sense of failure, since the very experience of shame points to our inability to escape the binds of socialization.
Amy Sutherland struck a chord with her recent Times essay — still high on the most e-mailed list — about how she successfully applied the techniques of exotic animal trainers to change some annoying traits of her husband, Scott. He became her guinea pig for methods she discovered as she researched a book on trainers teaching hyenas to pirouette, baboons to skateboard and elephants to paint.
"The central lesson I learned from exotic animal trainers is that I should reward behavior I like and ignore behavior I don't," she wrote. "After all, you don't get a sea lion to balance a ball on the end of its nose by nagging."
She began using "approximations," which means rewarding the small steps toward learning a whole new behavior. "With the baboon you first reward a hop, then a bigger hop, then an even bigger hop," she wrote. "With Scott the husband, I began to praise every small act every time: if he drove just a mile an hour slower, tossed one pair of shorts into the hamper, or was on time for anything."
She also learned the concept of "incompatible behavior," training an animal in a new behavior that would make the annoying behavior impossible. To keep Scott from crowding her while she cooked, she set a bowl of chips and salsa across the room.
Could it be that simple? And does it work the other way around — can men train women using exotic animal techniques?
Helen Fisher, a Rutgers anthropologist and the author of "Why We Love: The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Love," speculated that it might be easier for men to train women because "women are better at reading the emotions in your voice, better at seeing things in their peripheral vision, better at seeing in the dark. So just the man's tone of voice as opposed to even the words could be rewarding."
Both sexes would be better off following the lead of animal trainers and ignoring irritating bad behavior.
"Women are more verbal," she said. "But that doesn't mean that men aren't manipulative. I think both sexes are busy manipulating each other. Women will nag and men will tease. There's a kind of teasing that's just cloaked nagging."
She observed that it may be hard for men to use compliments to alter female behavior because women give and get so many polite or insincere compliments from other women that they're immune to flattering words.
"Men and women tend to get intimacy differently," she explained. "Women get intimacy from face-to-face contact. We do what we call the anchoring gaze. It comes from millions of years of holding your baby in front of your face. Men tend to get intimacy by doing things side by side, because for millions of years they faced their enemy but sat side by side with their friends.


emily and business casual hiking steve
emily
margot with the wine for us yuppies
today's specials: irish car bombs and lunchboxes
emily puts a bib on before carbombing





"I kinda like how he called Fall Out Boy 'dangerous'. It felt like how Ice called Maverick 'dangerous' in 'Top Gun'." He said. "I kind of think of it this way: How could you feel like a superhero if you didn't have an arch-nemesis?"
When you give up your apartment in New York and move to another city, New York becomes the worst version of itself. Someone I know once wisely said that the expression "It's a nice place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there" is completely wrong where New York is concerned; the opposite is true. New York is a very livable city. But when you move way and become a visitor the city seems to turn against you. It's much more expensive (because you have to eat all your meals out and pay for a place to sleep) and much more unfriendly. Things change in New York; things change all the time. You don't mind this when you live here; it's part of the caffeinated romance of the city that never sleeps. But when you leave you experience change as a betrayal. You walk up Third Avenue planning to buy a brownie at a bakery you've always been loyal to, and the bakery's gone. Your dry cleaner moves to Florida; your dentist retires; the lady who made the pies on West Fourth Street vanishes; the maitre d' at P.J. Clarke's quits, and you realize you're going to have to start from scratch tipping your way into the hear of the cold, chic young woman now at the door. You've turned your back for a moment, and suddenly everything's different. You were an insider, a native, a subway traveller, a purveyor of tips into the good stuff, and now you're just another frequent flyer, stuck in a taxi on the Grand Central Parkway as you wing in and out of LaGuardia. Meanwhile, you read that Manhattan rents are going up, they're climbing higher, they've reached the stratosphere. It seems that the moment you left town they put up a wall around the place, and you were never manage to vault over it and get back into the city again.

click to enlarge. these are the celebs i look like according to myheritage.com - two korean actresses, a k-pop star, a thai pop star, jennifer beals, margaret cho, the president of the philippines, and posh spice. and ll cool j.

Philana: it's so funny, because i imagine this to be just the opposite of the type of conversations you have when you are with the guys
me: LOL
Philana: they are fun though
me: what do you imagine our conversations to be?
Philana: i'm not sure i imagine conversations
me: you've been there, you see what we talk about
Philana: yea. definitely not fashion, whatever it is.
well, maybe i could imagine a conversation
around fashion with them being like
"so what's up with girls wearing those boy shorts all the time"
or like "are thongs really that bad"
i don't know
If you come to SD you should aim for the first weekend in August. We can go watch a Kanye concert and holler "we want prenup."

mikey, steve-o, boss snuggles
jamie and beverly
christine
emily
with jericho
mmm shrimp chips

while we were gone, they dug a hole.
jeff hid inside, and they put a blanket over it.
they put everything back as it was before we left.
alex returned.
he got a sandwich. jeff jumped out and scared him. alex fell to the ground in shock.
he was in this pose for about 15 minutes.





The Daily Mail reports on a new study out of Britain that claims more women are speaking in lower voices to be accepted in the workplace. Although a little light on details, the study claims that women want to mimic the husky voice of actress Kathleen Turner to "compete with their deep-voiced male counterparts."
This conclusion is based on evidence that women's voices have become deeper in the last 50 years; the average pitch among women 18 to 25 apparently dropped by 23-hertz, equivalent to a semi-tone drop. (That means lower.) "Women have been striving to attain acceptance in a previously male-dominated society and they may have lowered their tone to enter that realm," Jonnie Robinson, a curator at the British Library and a dialect expert, told the Mail. "A deeper voice might be associated more with power."
...
I seriously question whether this so-called trend, which started in the 1970s, according to the article, is an effort to sound "manly," but rather to sound more "professional" -- the same way you hope your parents call you at your first job so you can shock them with how serious your voice is. It is interesting that when women try to make their voices deeper, they're thought to be trying to sound more masculine, although men talk in lower tones, too, when they want to appear extra authoritative.
There also may be another force at work: body changes. Yorkshire voice trainer Francis Newton says that as women's bodies grow bigger, their vocal cords become longer. As a result, their pitch and frequency become lower.